5CO03 Resubmission

Hi there, first of all, thanks a lot for your support and cooperation. you have completed my course work, but unfortunately I failed and the instructor sent the feedback to me in order to resubmit my course work again and follow the criteria for this submission as well. could you please go over on the attached files and review it again to be aligned with his feedback and do the changes on the files that you sent it to me ? please keep in mind, the words count should not exceed 2350 for task 2 and 1000 words for task 2 just do the modification. Below is the feedback from the instructor:
• Please address all stated action points in your resubmission
• Please undertake any amendments, highlighting in a different coloured font, if PowerPoint please use the Bold function
• Your resubmission MUST contain your full work (not just the parts which referred)

AC 1.1-REFER-1
Ghazi, you have not provided sufficient evidence to appraise what it means to be a people professional.
ACTION POINTS
You should provide a definition, explanation and appraisal of the term ‘professional’ and the requirements of a people professional. You then need to provide application of real examples, such as your own role, wider reading insights and the CIPD profession map in terms of professional and personal values. You need to provide explanation of this definition and personal values, such as fairness, honesty, exclusivity, and the concept of professional integrity.

AC 1.3-REFER-1
Ghazi, you have not demonstrated how you contribute confidently to discussions in a clear, engaging and informed way to influence others. You have not provided sufficient evidence for this criterion
ACTION POINTS
You need to provide an explanation of a contextual example where you have contributed to discussions and demonstrated that you are engaging and well informed.
Examples could include being courageous in speaking up, ensuring key processes are followed or improving practices in HR, L&D and OD.
You need to provide a range of strengths, weaknesses and final judgment on the approaches used.

AC 1.4-REFER-1
Ghazi, you have not reflected on how you have taken responsibility for your work/actions, including recognizing and rectifying mistakes. You have not provided sufficient evidence for this criterion.
ACTION POINTS
You need to provide an explanation of a contextual example where you have taken responsibility for your work/actions, with a reflection, that includes recognizing and rectifying mistakes
An example could be leading a project but overpromising and spending longer/more money.
You should provide an explanation of any mistakes and how these were rectified.
You need to include an insight into what you learned from these mistakes.

AC 1.5-REFER-1
You have not provided an explanation of a contextual example where you have raised concerns regarding conflicts with ethical values. You have not provided sufficient evidence for this criterion
ACTION POINTS
You should provide an explanation of a contextual example where you have taken responsibility for your work/actions, with a reflection, that includes recognizing and rectifying mistakes
An example could be leading a project but overpromising and spending longer/more money.
You should provide an explanation of any mistakes and how these were rectified.
Include insight into what you learned from these mistakes.

AC 2.1 REFER-1
Ghazi, you have not provided an argument of the the human and business benefits of people feeling included, valued, and fairly treated at work linking to related theory. You have not provided sufficient evidence for this criteria.
ACTION POINTS
You need to provide an argument for ethical people practice underpinned with supporting theory, such as Rock, Maslow, and Pink.
You need to provide a discussion on the business and human benefits of people at work feeling included, valued, and fairly treated. E.g., What does Pink say about motivation and reward? How does this support your argument?
You need to include a workplace example such as job satisfaction or enhanced worker well-being, reduced sickness or increased retention.

AC 2.2 REFER-1
Ghazi, you have not designed an impactful solution based on feedback and engagement with others. You have not provided sufficient evidence for this criterion
ACTION POINTS
You should provide an identification of an example of a solution that meets a particular need, with insight into the need and reasons for the solution.
You need to provide a commentary on how you would/have ensured the design was informed by others.
An example of this could be introducing flexible working in response to an engagement survey and benchmarking research.
You need to provide consideration of who was impacted by the solution, with an explanation of stakeholders and benefits

AC 2.3 REFER-1
Ghazi, you have not provided an explanation of how you evaluated the impact of the solution to influence and engage people within an organization. You have not provided sufficient evidence for this criterion
ACTION POINTS
You should provide an explanation of how you evaluated/would evaluate the impact of the solution, to measure levels of engagement with, and how well it met the needs of, those it was aimed at.
Include insight into whether objectives have been met, how the solution was managed and whether the employees accepted the solution.

AC 3.2 REFER-1
You have assessed your strengths, weaknesses and development areas based on self- assessment however you have not provided any feedback
ACTION POINTS
For this criterion you need to provide a minimum of two pieces of feedback from others.

AC 2.4 REFER-1
You have not reflected on your own approach to working inclusively and building positive working relationships with others.
ACTION POINTS
You need to provide a reflection based on the feedback received and your self-assessment.